Platform9 alternatives: keep the OpenStack you have

edgeContinuum vs Platform9, in one line: Platform9 brings its own private cloud platform and asks for your hosts. edgeContinuum sits on the OpenStack you already run and turns it into managed Kubernetes, PostgreSQL, VMs and apps. If your infrastructure works, you do not need to replace it to fix the layer above it.

No second control plane, no agent on your compute nodesManaged databases and an app catalog on topConnected in hours, not migrated over months
Two places to put the platform
Platform9 Private Cloud Director
Your teams
Private Cloud Director
VMs, Kubernetes, networking
KVM on your hosts
Your hardware
edgeContinuum
Your teams and clients
edgeContinuum
Managed Kubernetes, PostgreSQL, VMs, apps
The OpenStack you already run
Your hardware
One brings the platform. One sits on the platform you have.

The short answer, if you want one now

Already running OpenStack? Then Platform9 is solving a problem you do not have.

Private Cloud Director deploys its own OpenStack-based control plane on your hosts. If you have one that works, adopting it means replacing infrastructure to fix the layer above it. edgeContinuum adds that layer directly: managed Kubernetes with real day-2 operations, managed PostgreSQL, an application catalog and permissions at the level of the individual action. Start a free trial and connect a lab deployment, or book a call.

Leaving VMware? Then this is the destination, not a detour: OpenStack underneath, edgeContinuum on top, with the migration path set out here.

What you get on top

Services your teams consume, not just infrastructure

Managed Kubernetes with real day-2. Clusters on Cluster API with the OpenStack provider, dedicated or hosted control planes, control plane upgrades on request, node pools that scale and autoscale, and failed nodes remediated by health checks.

Managed PostgreSQL. Instances under an operator with high availability, in-place version upgrades and storage growth, ordered from the same catalog as everything else. Platform9 documents no database service.

An application catalog. Helm and container applications, private to a project or published platform-wide, versioned, with your own private registry credentials.

Permissions at the level of the action. Roles composed from more than two hundred individual permissions, granted to a user or a group at organization or project scope. Platform9 documents three built-in roles, with a granular model in beta. See identity and access.

No second control planeManaged PostgreSQLPer-tenant usage
Your situationPoints to
OpenStack already runs and worksedgeContinuum
Selling managed Kubernetes and databasesedgeContinuum
Per-tenant quotas and usage for billingedgeContinuum
Permissions finer than three rolesedgeContinuum
Leaving VMware and want managed services, not just VMsedgeContinuum
Sovereign or air-gapped, EU-builtedgeContinuum
You already run OpenStack, or plan toedgeContinuum
You want one vendor to own the hypervisor tooPlatform9

The real difference: whose control plane

Both products are OpenStack underneath, and Platform9 says so in their own documentation: compute, block storage, network and identity expose OpenStack APIs, with Keystone for identity and Cinder for block storage. So this is not OpenStack against something else. It is whose OpenStack, and how many control planes you end up running.

Private Cloud Director installs KVM and an agent on your hosts and runs a management plane, hosted by them or self-hosted on K3s. Adopting it means adopting it as the platform. edgeContinuum installs nothing on your compute nodes: it points at the OpenStack endpoints you already have, which is why connecting an existing deployment takes hours rather than a migration, and your operators keep Horizon and their tooling.

The questions people actually ask, one at a time

Open a row if you want the detail behind it. Where their documentation is silent we say so, rather than claiming a capability is absent.

Where does the platform sit?

edgeContinuumOn the OpenStack you runNothing installed on your compute nodes
Platform9It becomes the platformKVM and an agent on your hosts
More detail
Private Cloud Director is a management plane plus a data plane of your hosts running KVM, reached through a host agent on each machine. Their documentation states that compute, block storage, network and identity expose OpenStack APIs, with Keystone and Cinder underneath, so it is an OpenStack they deploy and maintain. edgeContinuum points at the endpoints of the OpenStack you already have, which is why connecting one takes hours rather than a migration.

Platform9 vs edgeContinuum: what teams can order

edgeContinuumManaged servicesKubernetes, PostgreSQL, VMs, apps from a catalog
Platform9Infrastructure and KubernetesVMs, networking, storage, clusters
More detail
Both give self-service virtual machines, networking and Kubernetes. edgeContinuum adds managed PostgreSQL and an application catalog of Helm and container apps that your own teams publish into, private to a project or shared platform-wide. Platform9 ships an App Catalog built on Terraform and sourced from a Git repository; no managed database service appears in their documentation as of September 2026.

Who handles the virtualization layer?

edgeContinuumYour OpenStack doesLive migration and scheduling, set up with you
Platform9They do, integratedLive migration, VM HA, rebalancing
More detail
This is the half we genuinely do not do, and it is worth being straight about. Platform9 integrates live migration, automatic VM recovery on host failure and Dynamic Resource Rebalancing across hosts, plus certified drivers for specific storage arrays. On our side those capabilities come from the OpenStack underneath, configured by your team or during the build with us.

How fine can permissions get?

edgeContinuumPer individual actionRoles you compose, granted to users or groups
Platform9Three built-in rolesAdmin, Self-Service User, ReadOnly
More detail
edgeContinuum composes roles from more than two hundred individual permissions, one per action the platform exposes, granted at organization or project scope, so an operations team can power-cycle a machine and scale a node pool without delete or credential access. Platform9 documents three built-in roles at domain or tenant scope, with a more granular model in beta as of their August 2026 release, plus SAML single sign on which we do not have.

How does the commercial side work?

edgeContinuumPer managed resourceUsage metered per tenant, exported to your billing
Platform9Per corePublished at $10.40 per core per month
More detail
edgeContinuum is a subscription per resource managed through the platform, clusters, databases and virtual machines, independent of cores, RAM or users, licensed to run on infrastructure you own. Platform9 publishes $10.40 per core per month within their cloud service provider programme, so the bill scales with the hardware you own rather than with what you sell. There is no public list price for direct purchase. No billing or metering feature appears in their product documentation.

Sources: Platform9 product and architecture documentation and release notes to August 2026, plus their service provider programme page, checked September 2026.

Leaving VMware? This is the destination

If you are getting off vSphere, you are our core case, not a reason to look elsewhere. The route is OpenStack for the infrastructure and edgeContinuum for everything your teams touch: the VMware alternative page sets out where each piece of a vSphere estate lands, and the migration guide covers the phases. You do not have to move in one step, and you end up with managed Kubernetes, managed PostgreSQL and an app catalog rather than a like-for-like hypervisor swap.

The virtualization operations people ask about, live migration, VM high availability, rebalancing across hosts, come from OpenStack itself, configured by your team or ours during the build. What we add is the layer VMware never gave you either: self-service, managed services, tenancy that reports, and permissions per action.

Where Platform9 genuinely differs

  • They supply and operate the virtualization layer themselves, so you never run OpenStack. If not operating infrastructure is the goal, that is a real difference, though our fully on-premises and SaaS models cover much of the same ground.
  • Their platform ships certified drivers for specific storage arrays and validated backup vendors, which matters if your array is on that list and nothing else will do.

Where edgeContinuum differs

  • Your OpenStack stays yours: no second control plane, no agent on your compute nodes, no platform to migrate onto.
  • Managed PostgreSQL and an application catalog, neither of which appears in their documentation.
  • Permissions composed per action, against three built-in roles and a granular model still in beta.
  • Per-tenant usage export, sovereign and air-gapped deployment, and subscription per managed resource rather than per core.

Bring the deployment you actually have

Connect a lab OpenStack and see what the layer above it does. You will leave the call with a map of what your teams could be self-serving within a quarter, either way.

Frequently asked questions

What are the main Platform9 alternatives?
It depends which half of Private Cloud Director you are replacing. If you need the virtualization platform itself, the comparable names are OpenStack distributions you deploy yourself or with a partner, Proxmox VE at smaller scale, and the commercial VMware replacements. If what you actually need is the layer your teams and clients touch, self-service, managed Kubernetes, managed databases and tenancy, then the shortlist is platform layers rather than hypervisors, and that is where edgeContinuum sits. Deciding which of the two you are shopping for first saves a lot of time, because the two lists barely overlap.
Is edgeContinuum a Platform9 alternative?
Yes, for the part most people are actually shopping for: the self-service console, the tenancy model and the services teams consume, where we go further with managed databases and an application catalog. The difference underneath is that Private Cloud Director supplies the virtualization layer itself, while we run on OpenStack, which supplies it instead. Either way you end up with a private cloud; the question is whether the platform underneath is yours or theirs.
Both products use OpenStack. What actually differs?
Whose OpenStack it is. Platform9's documentation states that compute, block storage, network and identity expose OpenStack APIs, with Keystone and Cinder underneath, deployed and maintained by them on hosts you provide. edgeContinuum brings no OpenStack and installs nothing on your compute nodes: it attaches to the deployment your team already operates and adds managed Kubernetes, managed PostgreSQL, virtual machines, an application catalog and a permission model on top.
Can Platform9 manage our existing OpenStack?
We could not find current documentation describing that, and we will not assert it either way. What their documentation describes is Private Cloud Director deploying and operating its own OpenStack-based control plane on your hosts, plus OpenStack-compatible APIs so existing tooling keeps working. Attaching to the OpenStack you already run, without touching your compute nodes, is what this platform is built to do.
Which is better for a service provider?
If you are selling anything beyond plain virtual machines, edgeContinuum. Selling IaaS alone is a thin business, and the margin is in managed Kubernetes, databases and applications, which is the layer we automate: organizations, enforced quotas, per-tenant usage for your billing, and permissions granular enough to delegate to your clients' own administrators. Note also that Platform9 charges per core, so your bill grows with the hardware you own rather than with what you sell. See the platform for service providers.
How does pricing compare?
The models differ more than the numbers. Platform9 publishes $10.40 per core per month within their cloud service provider programme, so the bill scales with the cores you own. edgeContinuum is a subscription per resource managed through the platform, clusters, databases and virtual machines, independent of vCPUs, cores or users. You licence the platform and run it on your own infrastructure, so the bill follows the services you actually sell rather than the size of the hardware you bought.
What about Kubernetes specifically?
Both use Cluster API underneath. What differs is everything after create: Platform9 includes Kubernetes with a shared hosted control plane model managed by their management cluster. edgeContinuum provisions CNCF-conformant clusters on your OpenStack with a choice of hosted or dedicated control planes and owns the day-2 work: control plane upgrades, node pool scaling and autoscaling, and remediation of failed nodes. The control plane guide covers the tradeoff.
Do we have to leave VMware first?
Not for us, and not in one step. edgeContinuum needs an OpenStack to attach to, so the usual sequence is to stand one up alongside what you run, connect it, and move workloads as they come up for renewal. The migration guide covers the phases, and the shortlisting guide covers the routes if you have not chosen a destination yet.